Barack Obamas Spread The Wealth Plan

by Josh Greenberger

(October 17, 2008) Barack Obama to Joe the Plumber on October 13: "... I'm gonna cut taxes a little bit more for The Folk Who are MOST in Need. And for the 5% Of The Who folks are doing very well - Even Though they've Been working hard, and I Appreciate That - I just want to make sure they're Paying a little bit more in order to pay for tax cuts Those Other. Now, I Respect the disagreement. I Just Want You To Be clear, it's Not That I want to punish your success, I just want to make sure That everybody Who is behind you - That they've got a chance at success too. "

Does not this statement if you worry, You Have not Looked at it too Closely. It's Been Proven Over and Over from That Taking Those who've Earned Giving It and Those Who Have not, Does not Help Those Who Gave gold Those Who received - it ruins everybody!

The mortgage crisis we're experiencing Currently about WAS EXACTLY That - giving "opportunities" to the Less Privileged, by Taking (undeserved loans) from The Banker. We all know how That Turned Out. It Did not Spread the Wealth. It spread disaster.

Does not help promote social Underachievers, it only Reduces Overall achievement.

What IS Obama Proposing Is Another form of Affirmative Action. Purpose, INSTEAD of Giving a Job That You Qualify for a less qualified person to, he wants to GIVE money you've Earned That to Someone Who has not. This is absolutely outrages.

Institutionalized handouts do not make people do better, It Only Makes Them expect more. Obama's Plan Would Turn Into The Entire U.S. an "inner city." Can you think of a more counterproductive plan?

Why does Obama's Plan for Giving people a "chance at success" revolve around Taking from Others, to begin with? It Does not Produce more goods and services, it only (unethically) What We Have reshuffle.

There are no options That take from one and GIVE to everyone.

A reduction in fuel Costs Would put money in the pocket of Every American by Reducing The Price of a long list of Other Goods and Services - And We Would not Have to take money from anyone. All We Have to DO IS lift all restrictions on oil drilling.

Goal Obama's answer to lift oil drilling restrictions, as Senator McCain Pointed out, SI He'll "look at it?"

Let me see if I Understand this correctly. To take money from one person and give it to Another, That Obama Does not Have to "look at," he "knows" it'll work, despite The Fact That Other Programs Have Such failed miserably. Purpose lifting drilling restrictions, Which has absolutely no drawbacks, no downside, It Takes money out of no one's pocket, it'll Produce jobs, it'll Stimulate the Economy Even Before gas prices drop drastically - That he has to "look at ? Is he kidding? It's Almost as if Obama's working year for enemy country and Trying to Bring Us Down.

And this nonsense about how well Obama Carries Himself in debates IS idiocy. There's no question Obama cam off calm and "cooler" than McCain In The Presidential Debate. (Maybe Obama Would not Be so calm and cool if he HAD gone-through in life What McCain has gone through, that's to A Whole Other discussion.) Purpose The Notion That Would Obama do better as a president or Better Because He debates Comes Off Better IS foolish. Who's he going to have President Debate; bin Laden Achmedinejad, OPEC, the Caribou reindeer in Alaska?

And Do We Really Want a President Whose going to look calm and cool while we're Being nuked by Achmedinejad, or weekends Would Rather Have a President Who Knows How to Deal With brutal regimes?

Obama Being Plagued With allegations of links to shady people and activities - from Associating With A terrorist to ACORN's election scandals to Threatening Legal Action Against People Who Criticize him - should "pause for thought Give You. McCain On The Other Hand, Who's Been a media reviled by That Is No frie.