911 Inside Job The Most Damning Evidence Yet

@halftimesportscards scrap metal falling from two skyscrapers could bring down a building in a demolition style, awesome whts ur next theory dude,there were many other sky scrapers around, even small buildings,wtc 5 and wtc 6 where closer to te ones demolished,but they were only mildly damaged while this one fall down in a dmolition style.

@karthikthomask They didn't find Bin Laden because Bush found an opportunity to chase Hussein instead. We can see that he's stupid, but we can't contradict ourselves and credit him for being smart enough for covering this... The firefighters explained it clearly. They said WTC 7 is leaning, and there's no way to stop it from coming down. They were there. They saw the supports wiped out and the fires weakening the building. They knew it was coming down, but not by explosives.

@karthikthomask The outer shell of the building was the strength of the building. When the floors gave way, the collapse was contained instead of falling all over the place... I never said the molten aluminum caused the collapse. What caused the collapse is the heat warping the truss floors and cracking the concrete. Trusses don't melt, they just weaken. As for WTC 7, there's pictures showing a 10 story gash. 25% of the supports were wiped out.

@halftimesportscards Explain the third building, explain how steel melted,Explain why the government is not giving a satisfactory explanation..explain why bush lied abt it and later denied to discuss abt it.explain why they didnt find bin laden.Is beard terrorist smarter than entire american army or is american army the dumbest in the world.

@karthikthomask One side of the building was covered in sporadic fires. Taking out 25% of the supports is one thing, but when you add the fires to weaken the metal and crack the concrete, it's asking for trouble. If that building was untouched, but still fell, I would have a beef about it... But given the circumstances and the condition of the building, I am in no way surprised that the building fell. As for Afghanistan, we're just waiting for Pakistan to let us in (where Osama is hiding).

@karthikthomask The other buildings were much smaller. WTC 7 had 40+ floors on top of a severely damaged foundation. There was a 10 story hole in the center of the building with fires running rampant. The front side of the building looked like the OKC bombing.. The difference is that WTC 7 was being eaten alive by fire.... They have videos of the fires they were trying to put out in the building. It was an inferno. Fire doesn't help metal. It won't melt it, but it will weaken it.

@halftimesportscards how was the support wiped out, loot at other wtc closer to the buildings the are damaged but still standing up, but 7 it came down like a controlled explosion, a building will never collapse the way it does by mere damage of 25%, even u see buldings damaged at oneside.The reason they havn captured ladden because they dont want to, a reason to stay in afgan to loot their resources.Okay its obama now ,he is doing the same as bush, they r all puppets of someone.

@halftimesportscards RFC holds the rest because of pillar and belt support,it will only fall down unless it was an explosion of pillars and belts or melting of steel.Then how did the impact came to the other side,there is no way the building could collapse in 6 seconds with mere damage dude

Some of the facts -

Several tons of molten iron - Rapid oxidation and intergranular melting

Microspheres of molten iron - 1400 victims blown into tiny fragments

Total building destruction - Complete dismemberment of steel frame

Temperatures well above what is possible under alleged conditions

Expanding pyroclastic dust clouds - Positive ID of Nano Thermite

Mid-air pulverization of 90,000 tons of concrete & metal decking

Destruction through path of greatest resistance at near free-fall

@oursedatedyouth

Instead of using Tuskegee in your arguments, use the medical experiments done on Guatemalans. It's much more damning.